Recently found on PATIENTS LIKE ME website.
Developing an effective relationship with your physician
Use the checklist below to evaluate your relationship with your physician. If your doctor is not currently meeting your needs or expectations, talk with him or her about changes that could improve your level of satisfaction. You are a consumer of your health care, and you should work to ensure that you are receiving the quality of care you deserve.
____ Are you comfortable with your doctor? Does he or she make you feel at ease?
____ Does your doctor understand your personal priorities? Does he or she take them into consideration when making recommendations about your treatment?
____ Does your doctor listen to your concerns and take them seriously?
____ Does your doctor ask you about the impact of symptoms and side effects on your daily life?
____ Is your doctor respectful of your opinion and the opinion of your family caregiver? Does he or she see you and your family caregiver as equal partners in the management of your PD?
____ Does your doctor explain his or her recommendations in a way that is easy to understand?
____ Does he or she give you thorough instructions regarding medications or other treatment options?
____ Does your doctor recommend nondrug treatments in addition to medications (exercise, diet, attention to emotional well-being)?
____ Does your doctor inquire about aspects of your health that fall outside of his or her specialty? Does he or she talk to, or share files with, your other physicians?
____ Is your doctor or a member of his or her staff available to answer your questions or address your concerns between office visits?
____ Does your doctor arrive for your appointments in a timely manner? Does he or she allow enough time for a thorough examination and to answer your questions?
____ Does your doctor educate you about PD on an ongoing basis? Does he or she refer you to additional resources or support groups?
____ Does your doctor encourage you to get a second opinion or refer you to a specialist when appropriate?
____ Does your doctor stay up to date on research findings about PD and new treatment options?
____ Does he or she inform you about clinical trials in which you may be eligible to participate?
*Taken from Moving Forward printed by Azilect
Wednesday, December 24, 2008
Saturday, December 20, 2008
"RIDING THE WAVES OF PD"
"RIDING THE WAVES OF PD"
I came across this post title while visiting the Forum @ PATIENTS LIKE ME.
www.patientslikeme.com/
What a great way to describe the journey we find ourselves on. A much more positive feeling than THE ROLLERCOASTER RIDE OF PD.
If you're riding the waves you are trying to stay on your board and in control of the adventure.
If your'e on the rollercoaster, you are just on for the ride with all of the ups and downs and nothing to say or do about the experience.
RIDING THE WAVES...A BETTER WAY TO GO.
I came across this post title while visiting the Forum @ PATIENTS LIKE ME.
www.patientslikeme.com/
What a great way to describe the journey we find ourselves on. A much more positive feeling than THE ROLLERCOASTER RIDE OF PD.
If you're riding the waves you are trying to stay on your board and in control of the adventure.
If your'e on the rollercoaster, you are just on for the ride with all of the ups and downs and nothing to say or do about the experience.
RIDING THE WAVES...A BETTER WAY TO GO.
Friday, December 19, 2008
Thursday, December 18, 2008
FREE MEDICINE PROGRAM....
Bookmark this page and help spread the word: 
Thanks to USA federal government incentives, pharmaceutical companies may provide free prescription medicines if:
- You have no insurance
- You have reached a gap in private or public prescription insurance coverage (like many Medicare beneficiaries do with Part D)
- You simply don't have enough money to pay for your medications
Generally, if you earn less in a year than the levels shown below, you may qualify for some or all of the prescription drugs you need:
- $39,200 for single people
- $52,800 for couples
- $80,000 for a family of four.
Most people have no idea that instead of paying the high prices at their pharmacy, they could be picking up their medicine for free or low cost at the same pharmacy, just by applying and being approved for free medicine. Being eligible and approved is easier than most people think. (And FreeMedicine is here to help you do just that.) Have your medication delivered to your home, local pharmacy or doctor's office, for FREE from special programs designed for people in the USA with incomes as high as $80,000.00. - Please apply if you:*
- Are Uninsured
- Under-Insured
- Participate in Medicare Part D
- Take medicine not covered by insurance
Don't go without your medicine just because you can't afford it. Apply online right here (the fastest way to get started) or call 1-573-996-3333 to request a free brochure and application mailed to you today.
A single application may provide for up to one year of medicine free of charge to eligible individuals and an individual may reapply as many times as needed.
*Other requirements may apply. Each drug has it's own eligibilty criteria.
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
Monday, December 15, 2008
Thursday, December 11, 2008
STRESS.....IS A MESS. TO BETTER DAYS
STRESS IS A MESS.
It isn't always easy coping with chronic diseases, in fact it is sometimes damn hard.
Now adding a little extra stress....that's something no one needs. It is hard to understand how, just a little pinch of extra stress affects people with PD. It is hard to communicate this without sounding sorry for oneself.
There is no way to keep everyone at this time of year less stressful. It is worth a try,however to let people know one does not need that extra pinch without feeling guilty or with self-pity.
Straight talk is always helpful....that is if you have a friendly audience.
to Better Days.
It isn't always easy coping with chronic diseases, in fact it is sometimes damn hard.
Now adding a little extra stress....that's something no one needs. It is hard to understand how, just a little pinch of extra stress affects people with PD. It is hard to communicate this without sounding sorry for oneself.
There is no way to keep everyone at this time of year less stressful. It is worth a try,however to let people know one does not need that extra pinch without feeling guilty or with self-pity.
Straight talk is always helpful....that is if you have a friendly audience.
to Better Days.
Monday, December 8, 2008
PLM
I HOPE YOU WERE ABLE TO CATCH THE CBS NEWS ON DECEMBER 5TH @ 6:30PM.
IF NOT:
READ THE ARTICLE.http://www.businessweek.com/print/magazine/con. . The two-year-old venture has already signed up 23,000 participantsIN DEPTH December 4, 2008, 5:00PM EST
Health 2.0: Patients as Partners
Social networks like PatientsLikeMe let people take charge of their own care--changing the
nature of drug research and the practice of medicine
By Catherine Arnst
CBS-BusinessWeek Collaboration
The CBS Evening News with Katie Couric has investigated how patients can find reliable medical advice online
and looked at the emergence of medical social networks, in a series called Second Opinion: Medicine Online.
You can view these reports at cbsnews.com.
Medicine has always been a top-down affair. Doctors, drug companies, regulators, and researchers are the
expert gate-keepers, telling patients what they need to know. Even their own medical records are locked away to
protect their privacy. So what would happen if critically ill patients joined together, obtained their personal
information, and made it public?
Just such a real-world experiment is under way at a Web-based social network started by the company
PatientsLikeMe. The two-year-old venture has already signed up 23,000 participants in five chronic-illness
categories—amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Parkinson's disease, HIV/AIDS, multiple sclerosis, and mood
disorders.
On the company's Web site, PatientsLikeMe members are charting their medical histories in minute detail,
sharing their most private information with one another and the world at large, often with photos and real names
attached. To make money, the company aggregates these records, stripped of identifiers, and sells the
information to drug, device, and insurance companies, all with the consent of its patient-members. The buyers
can mine a rich vein of data on a variety of chronic illnesses that is simply not available anywhere else. In return,
patients get the hope that they are furthering progress toward cures.
This new patients-as-partners model is often called Health 2.0. PatientsLikeMe and a proliferation of similar
startups are building a new business predicated on the belief that the wisdom of crowds of patients will bring
insights, solace, and most of all, power.
Power because, as it turns out, patients talking among themselves on a global scale with complete transparency
produces all kinds of unexpected results. Drug side effects can be reported to regulators by the patients
experiencing them, without waiting for the manufacturers to come forward. Pharmaceutical companies can use
social networks to recruit subjects quickly for clinical trials, speeding up the pace of research. For that matter,
patients can simply band together and run their own clinical trials, leaving drug companies and physicians out of
the loop.
NO TIME TO LOSE
In a development that has caught the worried attention of the medical Establishment, some 250 members of
Health 2.0: Patients as Partners - BusinessWeek http://www.businessweek.com/print/magazine/con...
1 of 4 12/8/08 6:07 AM
Patients- LikeMe with ALS are testing lithium, a generic drug used to treat mood disorders, with no corporate or
academic imprimatur. The patient-run trial was instigated by Humberto Macedo, a 42-year-old systems analyst in
Brasilia City, Brazil, diagnosed in March 2007 with ALS, an incurable neurodegenerative disease.
Macedo was confined to a wheelchair, barely able to speak, soon after he was diagnosed. He could still use a
computer, though, and he quickly joined the ALS group on PatientsLikeMe. Researching his condition on the
Internet, Macedo discovered a report on a small Italian study in which lithium appeared to slow progression of
ALS. No company would be willing to finance a confirming trial of a drug that went off patent decades ago,
against a disease that strikes only 4 to 8 people per 100,000. So Macedo stepped up, proposing to fellow
PatientsLikeMe members that they test it themselves.
In December 2007 he posted a spreadsheet for recording symptoms and vital signs; ALS patients started taking
lithium daily and documenting their results. The number of participants in the test quickly reached 250, more
than five times as many as in the Italian study. Few doctors are willing to accept the results, nor would any
medical journal publish them, since the trial does not meet rigorous scientific standards. "But we can't count on
medical experts to get interested in ALS, and we don't have any time to lose," Macedo says via e-mail. "At least
we have tried something to help ourselves."
In any event, it looks as though lithium does not slow ALS, and Macedo says he is all right with that. He and his
cohort would have always wondered about its efficacy if they hadn't tested the drug. Even the prestigious journal
Nature Biotechnology, though skeptical about the value of the user-generated trial, treated the experiment
respectfully in an October editorial: "For patients with limited life expectancy, the ability to participate in a very
rough, low-level clinical study on a new treatment is far more appealing and timely than waiting for clinical data
to be published in peer reviewed literature."
The desire, and ability, of patients to participate in their own care isn't new. A January 2008 survey by market
researcher iCrossing found that 59% of U.S. adults search the Internet for health information. More surprisingly,
the study showed that 34% of the searchers visited emerging social media such as patient blogs, message
boards, and forums.
For the chronically ill, social networks mean not having to wait idly in between doctor's appointments. Patients
can reach out daily to fellow sufferers to find out what treatments work, or don't, what symptoms to worry about,
what actions to take. "The health-care system has traditionally delivered care for acute events only," says
Matthew Holt, an independent health-care consultant who organizes an annual Health 2.0 conference. "But
illness is lived in long, ongoing periods."
Critics worry that bad information will flourish in such forums, even though participants insist they won't fall for
quackery. "There is enough information that I can always check out any medicine if someone says it works,"
says PatientsLikeMe member Leonata Good, a 62-year-old Texan with Parkinson's. Holt acknowledges the
dangers, but he also points out that bad information is rife in brick-and-mortar medical settings. In any case "the
cat's out of the bag," he says. "This is happening, and the world has to deal with it."
Some of the first patient networks emerged from the nonprofit world, but the newest are commercial, and venture
capitalists are willing to finance them. There's sure to be some consolidation, but right now patients have a big
buffet to choose from. The options range from networks that encompass scores of diseases, like Trusera,
launched in July, to one-disease wonders such as SugarStats, a year-old resource for diabetics.
Health 2.0: Patients as Partners - BusinessWeek http://www.businessweek.com/print/magazine/con...
2 of 4 12/8/08 6:07 AM
PatientsLikeMe saw the business possibilities of Health 2.0 early on, in part because the company's founders,
brothers James (Jamie) and Ben Heywood, are acutely sensitive to the shortcomings of the current medical
system. Their middle brother, Stephen, was diagnosed with ALS in 1998 at age 29.
Jamie, the elder of the three and a computer scientist, quit his job the next year and started the nonprofit ALS
Therapy Development Institute in hopes of finding a cure. Progress was achingly slow, however, and by 2004 he
decided that a commercial venture would be able to scale up much faster.
He recruited his brother Ben and a mutual friend, Jeff Cole, all engineering graduates of the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology. The three went to work creating a forum that would allow legions of patients in the ALS
community to investigate new treatments together, using matching software loosely modeled after online dating
sites.
The idea wasn't the easiest sell, says Ben, now president, but the three managed to get $750,000 in combined
seed money from CommerceNet, an e-commerce incubator, and from eBay (EBAY) founder Pierre M. Omidyar's
investment group. In February 2007 the company raised $5 million more from venture capital firms.
The network launched in March 2006, supporting just one disease, ALS. Stephen Heywood was its charter
member, but he died that November when his ventilator accidentally disconnected. "I think if [PatientsLikeMe]
had been around earlier, it wouldn't have happened," says Jamie, the chairman, because other patients would
have put Stephen on guard against this not-uncommon danger.
Membership is now growing by 35% a month, and Jamie expects the total to hit one million by 2012. At that
point, he predicts, the network will encompass 200 different diseases. "We already have 5% of all ALS patients
in the U.S. on our site," he says. That's a larger data set on the disease than exists anywhere else.
The site gets patients to participate by offering them free tools for tracking their medications, symptoms, and
health outcomes, and storing the data in easy-to-read charts. A sophisticated search engine allows members to
find others whose medical profiles most closely match their own, making note-sharing that much easier.
Several pharmaceutical companies, universities, and research labs have purchased data from PatientsLikeMe,
and the founders believe the business will turn a profit in the next 12 to 24 months. Drug companies are also
paying fees to recruit participants for clinical trials. Novartis (NVS) was one of the first to sign on, in May 2008, in
order to speed up the start of a 1,200-patient study of a new medicine for multiple sclerosis. "We were in a real
crunch in terms of finding eligible patients," says Trevor Mundel, head of development for Novartis. "We saw an
immediate uptick in interest once we partnered with them," accelerating the trial by a few months.
PRIVACY ISSUES
All these deals are part of the Heywoods' overarching mission, to speed research by encouraging collaboration
between patients and researchers. Such partnerships are usually difficult to pull off because of the Health
Insurance Portability & Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), which strictly limits the flow of patient records to
insurers, employers, and other third parties. But HIPAA doesn't muzzle the patients themselves. And that opens
up a regulatory escape clause.
The PatientsLikeMe Web site explains to members as soon as they sign on that aggregated information will be
sold commercially, and that personal records are visible to others—including, inevitably, staff of drug and
insurance companies. The fact that so many patients agree to these terms stuns health-care experts. "I am
Health 2.0: Patients as Partners - BusinessWeek http://www.businessweek.com/print/magazine/con...
3 of 4 12/8/08 6:07 AM
constantly amazed at what patients will put out there," says Jennifer Texada, director for new media at M.D.
Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.
And no matter how often participants say they don't care who knows of their illnesses, there is always the risk
that patients will be harmed when personal information is exposed. "Discrimination in health care, housing, and
employment is a fact of life. The consequences of disclosure can be very serious," warns Susan M. Dooha,
executive director for the Center for Independence of the Disabled in New York.
Many patients find all this talk of consequences and concerns immaterial and patronizing. "I welcome
partnerships with pharma," says PatientsLikeMe member Ryan Rollinson, a 22-year-old Minneapolis resident
who is HIV positive. "That's how we can speed up progress." Steven Saling, a 40-year-old ALS patient in Boston,
describes a sense of liberation through PatientsLikeMe. "Current HIPAA regulations, while well intentioned, keep
researchers from connecting the dots to understand what causes ALS," he says.
The privacy issue could become more fraught as medical networks grow. "It only takes one patient with a bad
experience to change the culture," says Texada. Yet even when privacy violations occur, as they surely will,
patients who have embraced Health 2.0 are unlikely to give up their freedom to network. As Novartis' Mundel
acknowledges, "Patients will keep pressuring all of us in the direction of more openness."
Arnst is a senior writer for BusinessWeek based in New York.
Copyright 2000-2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved.
BUSINESS EXCHANGE: READ, SAVE, AND ADD CONTENT ON BW'S NEW WEB 2.0 TOPIC
NETWORK
The Implications of Patient Power
Health economist Jane Sarasohn-Kahn's sweeping April 2008 survey of medical social networks for the
California HealthCare Foundation spotlights many ramifications, including the emergence of new rating
systems for doctors and hospitals. For example, a startup called Vitals combines consumer and peer reviews
with empirical data.
To read Sarasohn-Kahn's report, go to http://bx.businessweek.com/health-20/reference/
Health 2.0: Patients as Partners - BusinessWeek http://www.businessweek.com/print/magazine/con...
4 of 4 12/8/08 6:07 AM
IF NOT:
READ THE ARTICLE.http://www.businessweek.com/print/magazine/con. . The two-year-old venture has already signed up 23,000 participantsIN DEPTH December 4, 2008, 5:00PM EST
Health 2.0: Patients as Partners
Social networks like PatientsLikeMe let people take charge of their own care--changing the
nature of drug research and the practice of medicine
By Catherine Arnst
CBS-BusinessWeek Collaboration
The CBS Evening News with Katie Couric has investigated how patients can find reliable medical advice online
and looked at the emergence of medical social networks, in a series called Second Opinion: Medicine Online.
You can view these reports at cbsnews.com.
Medicine has always been a top-down affair. Doctors, drug companies, regulators, and researchers are the
expert gate-keepers, telling patients what they need to know. Even their own medical records are locked away to
protect their privacy. So what would happen if critically ill patients joined together, obtained their personal
information, and made it public?
Just such a real-world experiment is under way at a Web-based social network started by the company
PatientsLikeMe. The two-year-old venture has already signed up 23,000 participants in five chronic-illness
categories—amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Parkinson's disease, HIV/AIDS, multiple sclerosis, and mood
disorders.
On the company's Web site, PatientsLikeMe members are charting their medical histories in minute detail,
sharing their most private information with one another and the world at large, often with photos and real names
attached. To make money, the company aggregates these records, stripped of identifiers, and sells the
information to drug, device, and insurance companies, all with the consent of its patient-members. The buyers
can mine a rich vein of data on a variety of chronic illnesses that is simply not available anywhere else. In return,
patients get the hope that they are furthering progress toward cures.
This new patients-as-partners model is often called Health 2.0. PatientsLikeMe and a proliferation of similar
startups are building a new business predicated on the belief that the wisdom of crowds of patients will bring
insights, solace, and most of all, power.
Power because, as it turns out, patients talking among themselves on a global scale with complete transparency
produces all kinds of unexpected results. Drug side effects can be reported to regulators by the patients
experiencing them, without waiting for the manufacturers to come forward. Pharmaceutical companies can use
social networks to recruit subjects quickly for clinical trials, speeding up the pace of research. For that matter,
patients can simply band together and run their own clinical trials, leaving drug companies and physicians out of
the loop.
NO TIME TO LOSE
In a development that has caught the worried attention of the medical Establishment, some 250 members of
Health 2.0: Patients as Partners - BusinessWeek http://www.businessweek.com/print/magazine/con...
1 of 4 12/8/08 6:07 AM
Patients- LikeMe with ALS are testing lithium, a generic drug used to treat mood disorders, with no corporate or
academic imprimatur. The patient-run trial was instigated by Humberto Macedo, a 42-year-old systems analyst in
Brasilia City, Brazil, diagnosed in March 2007 with ALS, an incurable neurodegenerative disease.
Macedo was confined to a wheelchair, barely able to speak, soon after he was diagnosed. He could still use a
computer, though, and he quickly joined the ALS group on PatientsLikeMe. Researching his condition on the
Internet, Macedo discovered a report on a small Italian study in which lithium appeared to slow progression of
ALS. No company would be willing to finance a confirming trial of a drug that went off patent decades ago,
against a disease that strikes only 4 to 8 people per 100,000. So Macedo stepped up, proposing to fellow
PatientsLikeMe members that they test it themselves.
In December 2007 he posted a spreadsheet for recording symptoms and vital signs; ALS patients started taking
lithium daily and documenting their results. The number of participants in the test quickly reached 250, more
than five times as many as in the Italian study. Few doctors are willing to accept the results, nor would any
medical journal publish them, since the trial does not meet rigorous scientific standards. "But we can't count on
medical experts to get interested in ALS, and we don't have any time to lose," Macedo says via e-mail. "At least
we have tried something to help ourselves."
In any event, it looks as though lithium does not slow ALS, and Macedo says he is all right with that. He and his
cohort would have always wondered about its efficacy if they hadn't tested the drug. Even the prestigious journal
Nature Biotechnology, though skeptical about the value of the user-generated trial, treated the experiment
respectfully in an October editorial: "For patients with limited life expectancy, the ability to participate in a very
rough, low-level clinical study on a new treatment is far more appealing and timely than waiting for clinical data
to be published in peer reviewed literature."
The desire, and ability, of patients to participate in their own care isn't new. A January 2008 survey by market
researcher iCrossing found that 59% of U.S. adults search the Internet for health information. More surprisingly,
the study showed that 34% of the searchers visited emerging social media such as patient blogs, message
boards, and forums.
For the chronically ill, social networks mean not having to wait idly in between doctor's appointments. Patients
can reach out daily to fellow sufferers to find out what treatments work, or don't, what symptoms to worry about,
what actions to take. "The health-care system has traditionally delivered care for acute events only," says
Matthew Holt, an independent health-care consultant who organizes an annual Health 2.0 conference. "But
illness is lived in long, ongoing periods."
Critics worry that bad information will flourish in such forums, even though participants insist they won't fall for
quackery. "There is enough information that I can always check out any medicine if someone says it works,"
says PatientsLikeMe member Leonata Good, a 62-year-old Texan with Parkinson's. Holt acknowledges the
dangers, but he also points out that bad information is rife in brick-and-mortar medical settings. In any case "the
cat's out of the bag," he says. "This is happening, and the world has to deal with it."
Some of the first patient networks emerged from the nonprofit world, but the newest are commercial, and venture
capitalists are willing to finance them. There's sure to be some consolidation, but right now patients have a big
buffet to choose from. The options range from networks that encompass scores of diseases, like Trusera,
launched in July, to one-disease wonders such as SugarStats, a year-old resource for diabetics.
Health 2.0: Patients as Partners - BusinessWeek http://www.businessweek.com/print/magazine/con...
2 of 4 12/8/08 6:07 AM
PatientsLikeMe saw the business possibilities of Health 2.0 early on, in part because the company's founders,
brothers James (Jamie) and Ben Heywood, are acutely sensitive to the shortcomings of the current medical
system. Their middle brother, Stephen, was diagnosed with ALS in 1998 at age 29.
Jamie, the elder of the three and a computer scientist, quit his job the next year and started the nonprofit ALS
Therapy Development Institute in hopes of finding a cure. Progress was achingly slow, however, and by 2004 he
decided that a commercial venture would be able to scale up much faster.
He recruited his brother Ben and a mutual friend, Jeff Cole, all engineering graduates of the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology. The three went to work creating a forum that would allow legions of patients in the ALS
community to investigate new treatments together, using matching software loosely modeled after online dating
sites.
The idea wasn't the easiest sell, says Ben, now president, but the three managed to get $750,000 in combined
seed money from CommerceNet, an e-commerce incubator, and from eBay (EBAY) founder Pierre M. Omidyar's
investment group. In February 2007 the company raised $5 million more from venture capital firms.
The network launched in March 2006, supporting just one disease, ALS. Stephen Heywood was its charter
member, but he died that November when his ventilator accidentally disconnected. "I think if [PatientsLikeMe]
had been around earlier, it wouldn't have happened," says Jamie, the chairman, because other patients would
have put Stephen on guard against this not-uncommon danger.
Membership is now growing by 35% a month, and Jamie expects the total to hit one million by 2012. At that
point, he predicts, the network will encompass 200 different diseases. "We already have 5% of all ALS patients
in the U.S. on our site," he says. That's a larger data set on the disease than exists anywhere else.
The site gets patients to participate by offering them free tools for tracking their medications, symptoms, and
health outcomes, and storing the data in easy-to-read charts. A sophisticated search engine allows members to
find others whose medical profiles most closely match their own, making note-sharing that much easier.
Several pharmaceutical companies, universities, and research labs have purchased data from PatientsLikeMe,
and the founders believe the business will turn a profit in the next 12 to 24 months. Drug companies are also
paying fees to recruit participants for clinical trials. Novartis (NVS) was one of the first to sign on, in May 2008, in
order to speed up the start of a 1,200-patient study of a new medicine for multiple sclerosis. "We were in a real
crunch in terms of finding eligible patients," says Trevor Mundel, head of development for Novartis. "We saw an
immediate uptick in interest once we partnered with them," accelerating the trial by a few months.
PRIVACY ISSUES
All these deals are part of the Heywoods' overarching mission, to speed research by encouraging collaboration
between patients and researchers. Such partnerships are usually difficult to pull off because of the Health
Insurance Portability & Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), which strictly limits the flow of patient records to
insurers, employers, and other third parties. But HIPAA doesn't muzzle the patients themselves. And that opens
up a regulatory escape clause.
The PatientsLikeMe Web site explains to members as soon as they sign on that aggregated information will be
sold commercially, and that personal records are visible to others—including, inevitably, staff of drug and
insurance companies. The fact that so many patients agree to these terms stuns health-care experts. "I am
Health 2.0: Patients as Partners - BusinessWeek http://www.businessweek.com/print/magazine/con...
3 of 4 12/8/08 6:07 AM
constantly amazed at what patients will put out there," says Jennifer Texada, director for new media at M.D.
Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.
And no matter how often participants say they don't care who knows of their illnesses, there is always the risk
that patients will be harmed when personal information is exposed. "Discrimination in health care, housing, and
employment is a fact of life. The consequences of disclosure can be very serious," warns Susan M. Dooha,
executive director for the Center for Independence of the Disabled in New York.
Many patients find all this talk of consequences and concerns immaterial and patronizing. "I welcome
partnerships with pharma," says PatientsLikeMe member Ryan Rollinson, a 22-year-old Minneapolis resident
who is HIV positive. "That's how we can speed up progress." Steven Saling, a 40-year-old ALS patient in Boston,
describes a sense of liberation through PatientsLikeMe. "Current HIPAA regulations, while well intentioned, keep
researchers from connecting the dots to understand what causes ALS," he says.
The privacy issue could become more fraught as medical networks grow. "It only takes one patient with a bad
experience to change the culture," says Texada. Yet even when privacy violations occur, as they surely will,
patients who have embraced Health 2.0 are unlikely to give up their freedom to network. As Novartis' Mundel
acknowledges, "Patients will keep pressuring all of us in the direction of more openness."
Arnst is a senior writer for BusinessWeek based in New York.
Copyright 2000-2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved.
BUSINESS EXCHANGE: READ, SAVE, AND ADD CONTENT ON BW'S NEW WEB 2.0 TOPIC
NETWORK
The Implications of Patient Power
Health economist Jane Sarasohn-Kahn's sweeping April 2008 survey of medical social networks for the
California HealthCare Foundation spotlights many ramifications, including the emergence of new rating
systems for doctors and hospitals. For example, a startup called Vitals combines consumer and peer reviews
with empirical data.
To read Sarasohn-Kahn's report, go to http://bx.businessweek.com/health-20/reference/
Health 2.0: Patients as Partners - BusinessWeek http://www.businessweek.com/print/magazine/con...
4 of 4 12/8/08 6:07 AM
Tuesday, December 2, 2008
THE WHALE RESCUE
The Whale
A female humpback whale had become entangled in a spider web of crab traps and lines.
She was weighted down by hundreds of pounds of traps that caused her to struggle to stay afloat
She also had hundreds of yards of line rope wrapped around her body, her tail, her torso, a
line tugging in her mouth.
A fisherman spotted her just east of the Faralon Islands (outside the Golden Gate ) and radioed
for help.
Within a few hours, the rescue team arrived and determined that she was so bad off, the only
way to save her was to dive in and untangle her -- a very dangerous proposition. One slap of
the tail could kill a rescuer.
They worked for hours with curved knives and eventually freed her.
When she was free, the divers say she swam in what seemed like joyous circles.
She then came back to each and every diver, one at a time, nudged them, and pushed gently,
thanking them.
Some said it was the most incredibly beautiful experience of their lives.
The guy who cut the rope out of her mouth says her eye was following him the
whole time, and he will never be the same.
May you, and all those you love, be so fortunate...
To be surrounded by people who will help you get untangled from the
things that are binding you.
And, may you always know the joy of giving and receiving gratitude.
I pass this on to you, my friend, in the same spirit.
Monday, December 1, 2008
PD...EARLY SIGNS
EARLY SIGNS :
My wife and I were talking about all the experiences you have all revealed, and after all these years we found that I had early signs no one thought much about. I was diagnosed officially in 2000, I had signs of tremors and frozen feet in 1998(that I was aware of) and friends always asked, why is Howard limping ? Twenty -five or so years ago my wife says that I had a night twitch and I remember having inner vibrations that I couldn't control. I suppose it would be so wise to check all these seemingly innocent situations...but we fall into the trap of thinking (or not) that it is nothing, just a passing annoyance. In talking with others I come away with the feeling that when doctors are faced with questions relating to innocent signs, they do not give enough thought as to why,what are the possibilities here, let's keep a close eye on this. If one could only be more aware of their own body and functions, then one could help themselves and their doctors to monitor and diagnose at a much earlier stage of any malfunction or disease.If this was so, maybe the researchers would be a little closer to why and/or what can we do to prevent the subsequent onset----one never knows----do one?
My wife and I were talking about all the experiences you have all revealed, and after all these years we found that I had early signs no one thought much about. I was diagnosed officially in 2000, I had signs of tremors and frozen feet in 1998(that I was aware of) and friends always asked, why is Howard limping ? Twenty -five or so years ago my wife says that I had a night twitch and I remember having inner vibrations that I couldn't control. I suppose it would be so wise to check all these seemingly innocent situations...but we fall into the trap of thinking (or not) that it is nothing, just a passing annoyance. In talking with others I come away with the feeling that when doctors are faced with questions relating to innocent signs, they do not give enough thought as to why,what are the possibilities here, let's keep a close eye on this. If one could only be more aware of their own body and functions, then one could help themselves and their doctors to monitor and diagnose at a much earlier stage of any malfunction or disease.If this was so, maybe the researchers would be a little closer to why and/or what can we do to prevent the subsequent onset----one never knows----do one?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)